![]() Descartes responds to this argument by conceding that there is indeed an extra premise needed, but denying that the cogito is a syllogism on the grounds that the extra premise-not 'all thinking things exist' but 'existence is necessary for thought'-is proved to be self evident by the cogito itself and is therefore receptive to analysis after the move from cogito to sum, but not present as a premise involved in the move. Indeed, it appears to be untenable as a statement based solely on introspection. The contention is that this is a syllogistic inference, for it appears to require the extra premise 'all thinking things exist' and that extra premise must surely have been rejected at an earlier stage of the doubt. The first of the three under scrutiny here concerns the nature of the step from "I think" to "I exist". There are countless different methods of doubting the validity of the cogito. Three arguments will be presented against the cogito, all of which will be rejected, before an examination of Bernard Williams' rejection of the cogito on the grounds of its third-person comprehensibility. The process by which he moves from the latter to the former is complex, interesting, and contentious this article will be limited to the nature of 'I' only as a by-product of my discussion of the internal structure of the cogito. Of course, the framing of the question 'How does Descartes try to prove his existence?' is unhelpful here, for the matter of Descartes proving his own existence as an historical figure is entirely different from his proof of the existence of some 'I'. Thought entails existence, being as it is the final point of any assertion (this is true both in terms of statements such as "I am thinking about a rose", which is true as long as I am and also such statements as "I breathe, therefore I exist", which itself is only true if it can be reduced to thought). Therefore it is indubitable that I also exist, if he deceives me…he will still never bring it about that I am nothing as long as I think I am something."Īt this point Descartes claims to know that he exists due to the occurrence of any cognitive process, including doubt (this argument will hereafter be referred to as the cogito). There is some unidentified deceiver, however, all powerful and cunning, who is dedicated to deceiving me constantly. "I convinced myself that there is nothing at all in the world, no sky, no earth, no minds, no bodies is it not therefore also true that I do not exist? However, I certainly did exist, if I convinced my self of something. This concept is stated at the start of the second meditation as follows: In the statement "cogito ergo sum", he finds two: that he is thinking and, following this, that he exists. Having reached, at the end of the first meditation]], what he considers to be the ultimate level of doubt-the evil demon-Descartes seeks one fact of which he can be certain. The closest Descartes comes is "I am, I exist" that is, a statement, not an inference. He can't assume anything about who or what he really is but he can safely assume that he exists, otherwise, he would not be thinking about the fact that he exists.The phrase " cogito ergo sum" is not actually expressed in Descartes' Meditations. In order for him to doubt everything, he must exist. How are you supposed to know anything if you doubt everything? Eventually, he discovers his first axiom: I think therefore I am. In the same sense that you don't know you are in a dream when you are dreaming, how do you know that anything around you is as it truly is? So he started his philosophy with doubting everything.Īt first, he couldn't figure out where to go from there. Descartes basically argued that all of the axioms that had previously been used were wrong because they were not self-evident. Axioms are self-evident facets of reason that allow you to construct the rest of philosophy on them. Descartes basically said, "ok, but what if your brain is in a jar, and you are just dreaming all of this?" Many people would say, "ah well I see the sun, or I feel the grass, so therefore it exists". In his work, he goes about destroying the assumptions that most people had in philosophy before him. The phrase "I think therefore I am", or "Cogito ergo sum" in Latin, was made popular by the philosopher Rene Descartes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |